Political Sociology and the Fate of the Precariat Professor

Sarah Grunberg, Joshua Dubrow


The sociologists’ mandate is to recognize and research the social, political, and economic forces that influence people, and to advocate for the disadvantaged among us. If sociologists want to fulfill the whole mandate, they should also be willing to advocate for the precariat professor. These contingent workers teach part-time, are employed on a short-term basis, receive low pay and no health benefits, and have little input into the governance of the institutions in which they work; in short, precarity. To advocate for the precariat professor is to advocate for reform of the academic system. We argue that all sociologists should learn from their feminist colleagues in advocating for the precariat among us.  Political sociology has a special role to play in reforming academia; as students of the intersection of society and politics, and as the primary researchers of social movements, they could be at the forefront of radical sociology, public engagement, and activism.


Academia. Academic labor. Precarious work. Part-time teaching. Political sociology.

Full Text:



American Association of University Professors. (2017). Trends in the Academic Labor Force, 1975-2015. AAUP. Retrieved September 1, 2017, from https://www.aaup.org/our-work/research

Beckett, N. (2015, May 18). Skip the Department Meeting . Retrieved from Chronicle.com: http://www.chronicle.com/article/Skip-the-Department-Meeting/230241/

Bérubé, M., & Ruth, J. (2015). The humanities, higher education, and academic freedom: Three necessary arguments. New York: Palgrave McMillan.

Cardozo, K. M. (2017). Academic Labor: Who Cares? Critical Sociology, 43(3), pp. 405-428.

Cassuto, L. (2017, May 7). A Tenure Travck for Teachers? Retrieved from The Chronicle of Higher Education: http://www.chronicle.com/article/A-Tenure-Track-for-Teachers-/240015

Celis, K., & Kantola, J. (2009). When a Feminist Political Scientist Goes International . In J. Oldersma, J. Swiebel, & P. d. Vries, Joyce weet je nog? (pp. 93-103). Amsterdam: Academic Woemn's Press.

Dahlerup, D. (2010). The Development of gender and Politics as a new Research Field within the Framework of the ECPR. European Political Science, 9(1), pp. 85-98.

Dobbie, D., & Robinson, I. (2008). Reorganizing Higher Education in the United States and Canada. Labor Studies Journal, 33(2), pp. 117-140.

Dryzek, J. (2006). Revolutions without Enemies: Key Transformations in Political Science. American Political Science Review, 100(4), pp. 487-492.

Dubrow, J. K., & Kolczynska, M. (2015). A quem pertence o estudo da democracia? Sociologia, ciência política e a promessa da interdisciplinaridade na Sociologia política desde 1945. Sociologias, 17(38), pp. 92-120.

Feagin, J. (2001). Social Justice and Sociology: Agendas for the Twenty-First Century: Presidential Address. American Sociological Review, 66(1), pp. 1-20.

Fuller, A. (1996). Producing Radical Scholarship: The Radical Sociology Movement, 1967-75. Sociological Imagination, 33(1), pp. 37-54.

Gove, W. R. (1979). The Review Process and Its Consequences in the Major Sociology Journals. Contemporary Sociology, 8(6), pp. 799-804.

Gunnel, J. G. (2006). The Founding of the American Political Science Association: Discipline, Profession, Political Theory and Politics. American Political Science Review, 100(4), pp. 479-486.

Hicks, A. (1995). Is Political Sociology Informed by Political Science? Social Forces, 73(4), pp. 1219-1229.

Hicks, A., Janoski, T., & Schwartz, M. (2005). Political Sociology in the New Millennium. In T. Janoski, R. Alford, A. Hicks, & M. Schwartz, The Handbook of Political Sociology: States, Civil Societies, and Globalization (pp. 1-30). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Jacobs, K., Perry, I., & MacGillvary, J. (2015). The High Public Cost of Low Wages. Berkeley: UC Berkeley Center for Labor Research and Education.

Janoski, T., Alford, R. R., Hicks, A. M., & Schwartz, M. A. (2005). The Handbook of Political Sociology: States, Civil Societies, and Globalization. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Kalleberg, A. (2009). Precarious Work, Insecure Workers: Employment Relations in Transition. American Sociological Review, 74(1), pp. 1-22.

Lovenduski, J. (2010). The ECPR Standing Group on Gender and Politics. In K. Newton, & T. (. Boncourt, The ECPR’s First Forty Years 1970–2010 (pp. 32-33). Colchester: ECPR.

Lubin, J. (2016, Dec.). How Sociology Can Support Black Lives Matter. ASA footnotes, 44(8).

Mitra, S. K., & Pehl, M. (2010). Introduction. In S. K. Mitra, M. Pehl, & C. Speiss, in Political Sociology - The State of the Art (World of Political Science - The State of the Discipline), (pp. 13-30). Opladen, Germany: Barbara Budrich Publishers.

Porter, T. M. (2003). Statistics and Statistical Methods. In T. M. Porter, & D. Ross, The Cambridge History of Science: The Modern Social Sciences, v. 7 (p. Chapter 14). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Robinson, D. (2006). The status of higher education teaching personnel in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Report prepared for Education International. Ottawa: Canadian Association of University Teachers. Retrieved from https://www.caut.ca/docs/reports/the-status-of-higher-education-teaching-personnel-in-australia-canada-new-zealand-the-united-kingdom-and-the-united-states-report-prepared-for-education-international-(mar-2006).pdf

Ross, D. (2003). Changing Contours of the Social Science Disciplines. In T. M. Porter, & D. Ross, The Cambridge History of Science: The Modern Social Sciences (p. Chapter 13). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Satori, G. (1969). From the Sociology of Politics to Political Sociology. Government and Opposition, 4(2), pp. 195-214.

Sigelman, L. (2010). Terminological interchange between Sociology and Political Science. Social Science Quarterly, 91(4), pp. 883-905

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20336/sid.v2i2.62


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2017 Sociologies in Dialogue